|
Re: Crash when doing search on variable list 3.2d
Just received this answer from Magic:
So sorry that your having trouble with XPA Crash when doing search on variable list,
This is a know bug of XPA and is fixed with latest version of XPA 3.3g with
Just received this answer from Magic:
So sorry that your having trouble with XPA Crash when doing search on variable list,
This is a know bug of XPA and is fixed with latest version of XPA 3.3g with
|
By
Simone Zwaan <szwaan@...>
·
#192226
·
|
|
Re: Crash when doing search on variable list 3.2d
Same problem here after Windows 10 update to Version 1909. Very annoying!
No solution yet?
Regards, Simone
Same problem here after Windows 10 update to Version 1909. Very annoying!
No solution yet?
Regards, Simone
|
By
Simone Zwaan <szwaan@...>
·
#192225
·
|
|
New file uploaded to main@magicu-l.groups.io
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that the following files have been uploaded to the Files area of the main@magicu-l.groups.io group.
/Demo_WinsockDotNet_3.3.zip
Uploaded
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that the following files have been uploaded to the Files area of the main@magicu-l.groups.io group.
/Demo_WinsockDotNet_3.3.zip
Uploaded
|
By
main@magicu-l.groups.io Notification <main+notification@...>
·
#192224
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Sebastien,
I received your example with sqlite tables... tks!
Made a change to try for another gateways, sqlserver and oracle, and the problem appears not occur on these.
May be only affecting
Sebastien,
I received your example with sqlite tables... tks!
Made a change to try for another gateways, sqlserver and oracle, and the problem appears not occur on these.
May be only affecting
|
By
Roberto Gauer
·
#192223
·
|
|
Re: PSQL Gateway
hhmmmz, wrong location in discussion... 😀
hhmmmz, wrong location in discussion... 😀
|
By
Luuk
·
#192222
·
|
|
Re: PSQL Gateway
In 'X$File' (or, if referring to the actrual filename on disk: file.ddf) is a column defined as 'Xf$Loc' which should have the proper value for the location of your file.
In 'X$File' (or, if referring to the actrual filename on disk: file.ddf) is a column defined as 'Xf$Loc' which should have the proper value for the location of your file.
|
By
Luuk
·
#192221
·
|
|
Re: Screen scaling
Thanks Todd. That is amazing! Can't wait to try it out.
Arch Lineberger
203 N Main St
Belmont, NC 28012
704.461.1223
Thanks Todd. That is amazing! Can't wait to try it out.
Arch Lineberger
203 N Main St
Belmont, NC 28012
704.461.1223
|
By
Arch <Arch.Lineberger@...>
·
#192220
·
|
|
Re: PSQL Gateway
Arch,
Did you also copy sample/test data files? DDFs alone won't work with Magic. At the very least, you also need empty data files underlying the table definitions defined in the DDFs.
Arch,
Did you also copy sample/test data files? DDFs alone won't work with Magic. At the very least, you also need empty data files underlying the table definitions defined in the DDFs.
|
By
Steven Blank
·
#192219
·
|
|
Re: PSQL Gateway
Steve,
No data files yet. Just attempting to access the data so I can promise data conversion to my application.
Arch Lineberger
203 N Main St
Belmont, NC 28012
704.461.1223
Steve,
No data files yet. Just attempting to access the data so I can promise data conversion to my application.
Arch Lineberger
203 N Main St
Belmont, NC 28012
704.461.1223
|
By
Arch <Arch.Lineberger@...>
·
#192218
·
|
|
Re: PSQL Gateway
Keith,
The DDFs are from Sage. They are installed in my client's web folder. I have copied them to my development data folder and loaded them from there. They are binary, so perhaps encrypted?
Arch
Keith,
The DDFs are from Sage. They are installed in my client's web folder. I have copied them to my development data folder and loaded them from there. They are binary, so perhaps encrypted?
Arch
|
By
Arch <Arch.Lineberger@...>
·
#192217
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Yes, can you send an example to gawarez@...
Tks! :)
Yes, can you send an example to gawarez@...
Tks! :)
|
By
Roberto Gauer
·
#192216
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
I'm downloading it now, should be done by Sunday. The bug fix list in the release notes does not mention your problem or my HTTPCall() problem. Hopefully the next release will address both our
I'm downloading it now, should be done by Sunday. The bug fix list in the release notes does not mention your problem or my HTTPCall() problem. Hopefully the next release will address both our
|
By
Todd Baremore
·
#192215
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Do you already have XPA 4.6.1 Todd?
Roberto, I have no specific scenario. Just Task online and events in record suffix with condition : Stat(0,'D'mode).
If you want to test Roberto, I can pass you an
Do you already have XPA 4.6.1 Todd?
Roberto, I have no specific scenario. Just Task online and events in record suffix with condition : Stat(0,'D'mode).
If you want to test Roberto, I can pass you an
|
By
Sébastien GT
·
#192214
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Sebastien
Unfortunately the newly released 4.6.1 does not address this problem.
Todd
On 2/28/2020 5:53 AM, Sébastien GT wrote:
Sebastien
Unfortunately the newly released 4.6.1 does not address this problem.
Todd
On 2/28/2020 5:53 AM, Sébastien GT wrote:
|
By
Todd Baremore
·
#192213
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
So, for a simple simulation, a message box on the record Id inside a block with delete mode... should give me the next id number in dataview?
Can't simulate it here, is there a specific cenario?
So, for a simple simulation, a message box on the record Id inside a block with delete mode... should give me the next id number in dataview?
Can't simulate it here, is there a specific cenario?
|
By
Roberto Gauer
·
#192212
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Yes. and in the Help's File of 4.6, Magic write that's good to use stat(0,'D'mode) in Record Suffix : "Note: The D (Delete) status can be checked only in Record Suffix."
Yes. and in the Help's File of 4.6, Magic write that's good to use stat(0,'D'mode) in Record Suffix : "Note: The D (Delete) status can be checked only in Record Suffix."
|
By
Sébastien GT
·
#192211
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Case Number: 00083913
Case Owner: Nikhil Kawade
Status: Open (Under support review)
"Thank you for opening this case, We are able to reproduce this scenario. I will reporting this issue to our QA
Case Number: 00083913
Case Owner: Nikhil Kawade
Status: Open (Under support review)
"Thank you for opening this case, We are able to reproduce this scenario. I will reporting this issue to our QA
|
By
Sébastien GT
·
#192210
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Just so I understand, those lines in record suffix that were being executed against the wrong invoice had what condition: stat(0,'Delete'Mode)?
Keith
Get Outlook for Android
Just so I understand, those lines in record suffix that were being executed against the wrong invoice had what condition: stat(0,'Delete'Mode)?
Keith
Get Outlook for Android
|
By
Keith Canniff
·
#192209
·
|
|
Re: Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Owch ! Thanks. So close to a possible 4.6a release too.
Whats the QA Status of this ? If it has been accepted, could we have the Case Number so we can also check/harass ?
Steven Burrows
Owch ! Thanks. So close to a possible 4.6a release too.
Whats the QA Status of this ? If it has been accepted, could we have the Case Number so we can also check/harass ?
Steven Burrows
|
By
Steven Burrows
·
#192208
·
|
|
Warning : big bug on delete status in XPA 4.6 #xpa4.6
Please note, there is a huge bug in Magic XPA 4.6.
If you have an Online task with authorization to delete the current recording, and actions in record suffix linked to this deletion: these actions
Please note, there is a huge bug in Magic XPA 4.6.
If you have an Online task with authorization to delete the current recording, and actions in record suffix linked to this deletion: these actions
|
By
Sébastien GT
·
#192207
·
|